I'm running microsoft Sql for a Software called Everest FRom Icode. Two week
s
ago was but now when I check the w2003 performance screen sometimes sql use
over 60% of the resources. During top hours the server show 100% used. The
database is not even 1gb in size and we just have 20 users using the softwar
e
trought terminal services and the speed is bad and the performance is worst
any idea.
Thank you.Hi
Check that you have database maintenance scheduled to run perodically on
this database, this would re-organise indexes and update statistics. Your
vendor should be able to indicate what processes they have in place to carry
out this work. If they are carried out by scheduled tasks check in Enterpris
e
Manager for scheduled tasks which do this job that have failed.
In general SQL Server it is best to have SQL Server on a dedicate machine,
and not have it competing with other applications for resources.
John
"enriqueto" wrote:
> I'm running microsoft Sql for a Software called Everest FRom Icode. Two we
eks
> ago was but now when I check the w2003 performance screen sometimes sql us
e
> over 60% of the resources. During top hours the server show 100% used. The
> database is not even 1gb in size and we just have 20 users using the softw
are
> trought terminal services and the speed is bad and the performance is wors
t
> any idea.
> Thank you.
>
Showing posts with label w2003. Show all posts
Showing posts with label w2003. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Performance Problems Sql2000 SP3 on W2003 Server
I'm running microsoft Sql for a Software called Everest FRom Icode. Two weeks
ago was but now when I check the w2003 performance screen sometimes sql use
over 60% of the resources. During top hours the server show 100% used. The
database is not even 1gb in size and we just have 20 users using the software
trought terminal services and the speed is bad and the performance is worst
any idea.
Thank you.
Hi
Check that you have database maintenance scheduled to run perodically on
this database, this would re-organise indexes and update statistics. Your
vendor should be able to indicate what processes they have in place to carry
out this work. If they are carried out by scheduled tasks check in Enterprise
Manager for scheduled tasks which do this job that have failed.
In general SQL Server it is best to have SQL Server on a dedicate machine,
and not have it competing with other applications for resources.
John
"enriqueto" wrote:
> I'm running microsoft Sql for a Software called Everest FRom Icode. Two weeks
> ago was but now when I check the w2003 performance screen sometimes sql use
> over 60% of the resources. During top hours the server show 100% used. The
> database is not even 1gb in size and we just have 20 users using the software
> trought terminal services and the speed is bad and the performance is worst
> any idea.
> Thank you.
>
ago was but now when I check the w2003 performance screen sometimes sql use
over 60% of the resources. During top hours the server show 100% used. The
database is not even 1gb in size and we just have 20 users using the software
trought terminal services and the speed is bad and the performance is worst
any idea.
Thank you.
Hi
Check that you have database maintenance scheduled to run perodically on
this database, this would re-organise indexes and update statistics. Your
vendor should be able to indicate what processes they have in place to carry
out this work. If they are carried out by scheduled tasks check in Enterprise
Manager for scheduled tasks which do this job that have failed.
In general SQL Server it is best to have SQL Server on a dedicate machine,
and not have it competing with other applications for resources.
John
"enriqueto" wrote:
> I'm running microsoft Sql for a Software called Everest FRom Icode. Two weeks
> ago was but now when I check the w2003 performance screen sometimes sql use
> over 60% of the resources. During top hours the server show 100% used. The
> database is not even 1gb in size and we just have 20 users using the software
> trought terminal services and the speed is bad and the performance is worst
> any idea.
> Thank you.
>
Performance Problems Sql2000 SP3 on W2003 Server
I'm running microsoft Sql for a Software called Everest FRom Icode. Two weeks
ago was but now when I check the w2003 performance screen sometimes sql use
over 60% of the resources. During top hours the server show 100% used. The
database is not even 1gb in size and we just have 20 users using the software
trought terminal services and the speed is bad and the performance is worst
any idea.
Thank you.Hi
Check that you have database maintenance scheduled to run perodically on
this database, this would re-organise indexes and update statistics. Your
vendor should be able to indicate what processes they have in place to carry
out this work. If they are carried out by scheduled tasks check in Enterprise
Manager for scheduled tasks which do this job that have failed.
In general SQL Server it is best to have SQL Server on a dedicate machine,
and not have it competing with other applications for resources.
John
"enriqueto" wrote:
> I'm running microsoft Sql for a Software called Everest FRom Icode. Two weeks
> ago was but now when I check the w2003 performance screen sometimes sql use
> over 60% of the resources. During top hours the server show 100% used. The
> database is not even 1gb in size and we just have 20 users using the software
> trought terminal services and the speed is bad and the performance is worst
> any idea.
> Thank you.
>
ago was but now when I check the w2003 performance screen sometimes sql use
over 60% of the resources. During top hours the server show 100% used. The
database is not even 1gb in size and we just have 20 users using the software
trought terminal services and the speed is bad and the performance is worst
any idea.
Thank you.Hi
Check that you have database maintenance scheduled to run perodically on
this database, this would re-organise indexes and update statistics. Your
vendor should be able to indicate what processes they have in place to carry
out this work. If they are carried out by scheduled tasks check in Enterprise
Manager for scheduled tasks which do this job that have failed.
In general SQL Server it is best to have SQL Server on a dedicate machine,
and not have it competing with other applications for resources.
John
"enriqueto" wrote:
> I'm running microsoft Sql for a Software called Everest FRom Icode. Two weeks
> ago was but now when I check the w2003 performance screen sometimes sql use
> over 60% of the resources. During top hours the server show 100% used. The
> database is not even 1gb in size and we just have 20 users using the software
> trought terminal services and the speed is bad and the performance is worst
> any idea.
> Thank you.
>
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Performance Object SQL Server
Hello
We are running W2003 Server with SQL Server 2000. Now I want to monitor
performance using the administrative tool Performance.
According to the SQL Server 2000 System Administration (Chapter 14), there
should be several SQL Server Performance Objects to track SQL server
activity, but...
I can't find them. What happend, where are they.
Anyone?
Thanks,
BartBart
I'm nbot sure uinderstand you. Click Start --Run --perfmon.
On the sceen right click and Add counters. There is Perfomance Object
combobox where you can choose many counters for SQL Server as well
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:%23EaGga8PHHA.404@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Hello
> We are running W2003 Server with SQL Server 2000. Now I want to monitor
> performance using the administrative tool Performance.
> According to the SQL Server 2000 System Administration (Chapter 14), there
> should be several SQL Server Performance Objects to track SQL server
> activity, but...
> I can't find them. What happend, where are they.
> Anyone?
> Thanks,
> Bart
>|||Thats the problem, It should be there but it isn't.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:OGHpRg8PHHA.3544@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> I'm nbot sure uinderstand you. Click Start --Run --perfmon.
> On the sceen right click and Add counters. There is Perfomance Object
> combobox where you can choose many counters for SQL Server as well
>
>
>
>
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:%23EaGga8PHHA.404@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>|||Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that came
with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information. The last
one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the one I would
like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the other SQL server
into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap them.
thanks
Bart|||Bart
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that
> came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information. The
> last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the one I
> would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the other SQL
> server into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap them.
> thanks
> Bart
>|||Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>|||Bart
You are right, my mistake, sorry
For detailed information, please reference the following article:
330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>|||Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC) is
a DESKTOP version.
The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So those
may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any difference
in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the SQLS2000 System
Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> You are right, my mistake, sorry
> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>
> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>|||Bart
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
I have my doubt that a 'bad' written query will perform better if you add
more memory. I'd run SQL Server Profiler to identify long running queries
and start tunning them
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
> is a DESKTOP version.
> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>|||Hello Bart,
Can you pl. check the AWE option?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
Cheers,
MB
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
> is a DESKTOP version.
> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
We are running W2003 Server with SQL Server 2000. Now I want to monitor
performance using the administrative tool Performance.
According to the SQL Server 2000 System Administration (Chapter 14), there
should be several SQL Server Performance Objects to track SQL server
activity, but...
I can't find them. What happend, where are they.
Anyone?
Thanks,
BartBart
I'm nbot sure uinderstand you. Click Start --Run --perfmon.
On the sceen right click and Add counters. There is Perfomance Object
combobox where you can choose many counters for SQL Server as well
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:%23EaGga8PHHA.404@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Hello
> We are running W2003 Server with SQL Server 2000. Now I want to monitor
> performance using the administrative tool Performance.
> According to the SQL Server 2000 System Administration (Chapter 14), there
> should be several SQL Server Performance Objects to track SQL server
> activity, but...
> I can't find them. What happend, where are they.
> Anyone?
> Thanks,
> Bart
>|||Thats the problem, It should be there but it isn't.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:OGHpRg8PHHA.3544@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> I'm nbot sure uinderstand you. Click Start --Run --perfmon.
> On the sceen right click and Add counters. There is Perfomance Object
> combobox where you can choose many counters for SQL Server as well
>
>
>
>
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:%23EaGga8PHHA.404@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>|||Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that came
with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information. The last
one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the one I would
like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the other SQL server
into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap them.
thanks
Bart|||Bart
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that
> came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information. The
> last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the one I
> would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the other SQL
> server into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap them.
> thanks
> Bart
>|||Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>|||Bart
You are right, my mistake, sorry
For detailed information, please reference the following article:
330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>|||Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC) is
a DESKTOP version.
The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So those
may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any difference
in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the SQLS2000 System
Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> You are right, my mistake, sorry
> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>
> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>|||Bart
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
I have my doubt that a 'bad' written query will perform better if you add
more memory. I'd run SQL Server Profiler to identify long running queries
and start tunning them
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
> is a DESKTOP version.
> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>|||Hello Bart,
Can you pl. check the AWE option?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
Cheers,
MB
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
> is a DESKTOP version.
> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
Performance Object SQL Server
Hello
We are running W2003 Server with SQL Server 2000. Now I want to monitor
performance using the administrative tool Performance.
According to the SQL Server 2000 System Administration (Chapter 14), there
should be several SQL Server Performance Objects to track SQL server
activity, but...
I can't find them. What happend, where are they.
Anyone?
Thanks,
BartBart
I'm nbot sure uinderstand you. Click Start --Run --perfmon.
On the sceen right click and Add counters. There is Perfomance Object
combobox where you can choose many counters for SQL Server as well
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:%23EaGga8PHHA.404@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Hello
> We are running W2003 Server with SQL Server 2000. Now I want to monitor
> performance using the administrative tool Performance.
> According to the SQL Server 2000 System Administration (Chapter 14), there
> should be several SQL Server Performance Objects to track SQL server
> activity, but...
> I can't find them. What happend, where are they.
> Anyone?
> Thanks,
> Bart
>|||Thats the problem, It should be there but it isn't.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:OGHpRg8PHHA.3544@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> I'm nbot sure uinderstand you. Click Start --Run --perfmon.
> On the sceen right click and Add counters. There is Perfomance Object
> combobox where you can choose many counters for SQL Server as well
>
>
>
>
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:%23EaGga8PHHA.404@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Hello
>> We are running W2003 Server with SQL Server 2000. Now I want to monitor
>> performance using the administrative tool Performance.
>> According to the SQL Server 2000 System Administration (Chapter 14),
>> there should be several SQL Server Performance Objects to track SQL
>> server activity, but...
>> I can't find them. What happend, where are they.
>> Anyone?
>> Thanks,
>> Bart
>|||Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that came
with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information. The last
one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the one I would
like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the other SQL server
into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap them.
thanks
Bart|||Bart
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that
> came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information. The
> last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the one I
> would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the other SQL
> server into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap them.
> thanks
> Bart
>|||Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that
>> came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information.
>> The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the one
>> I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the other SQL
>> server into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>|||Bart
You are right, my mistake, sorry
For detailed information, please reference the following article:
330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that
>> came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information.
>> The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the
>> one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the
>> other SQL server into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap
>> them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>|||Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC) is
a DESKTOP version.
The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So those
may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any difference
in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the SQLS2000 System
Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> You are right, my mistake, sorry
> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>
> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that
>> came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information.
>> The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the
>> one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the
>> other SQL server into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap
>> them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>>
>|||Bart
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
I have my doubt that a 'bad' written query will perform better if you add
more memory. I'd run SQL Server Profiler to identify long running queries
and start tunning them
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
> is a DESKTOP version.
> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> You are right, my mistake, sorry
>> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>> that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>> information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>> that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>> objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or maybe
>> how to swap them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>>
>>
>|||Hello Bart,
Can you pl. check the AWE option?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
Cheers,
MB
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
> is a DESKTOP version.
> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> You are right, my mistake, sorry
>> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>> that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>> information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>> that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>> objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or maybe
>> how to swap them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>>
>>
>|||That would be the next step, but I got stuck at perfmon, because I couldn't
find any counters.
I'll skip to that part now, and hope to find info on the counters in the
mean time. If you have any more info, please let me know.
regards,
Bart
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:%23jD6leGQHHA.780@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Bart
>> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
>> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
> I have my doubt that a 'bad' written query will perform better if you add
> more memory. I'd run SQL Server Profiler to identify long running queries
> and start tunning them
>
>
>
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
>> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
>> is a DESKTOP version.
>> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
>> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
>> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
>> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
>> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> You are right, my mistake, sorry
>> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>> that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>> information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>> that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>> objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or
>> maybe how to swap them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>>
>>
>>
>|||I've looked into this, but I don't think this option applies to my
situation. First we are using Window 2003 Server Standard, and second this
is for very large memory sizes. We only have 4 GB. But thanks for the
support. Any other suggestions are welcome.
Regards
Bart
"MB" <MB@.MB.com> wrote in message
news:uedn1jGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hello Bart,
> Can you pl. check the AWE option?
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
> Cheers,
> MB
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
>> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
>> is a DESKTOP version.
>> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
>> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
>> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
>> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
>> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> You are right, my mistake, sorry
>> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>> that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>> information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>> that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>> objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or
>> maybe how to swap them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>>
>>
>>
>|||Try here: http://www.extremeexperts.com/SQL/FAQ/EnablingPerCounters.aspx
John
Bart Steur wrote:
> I've looked into this, but I don't think this option applies to my
> situation. First we are using Window 2003 Server Standard, and second this
> is for very large memory sizes. We only have 4 GB. But thanks for the
> support. Any other suggestions are welcome.
> Regards
> Bart
> "MB" <MB@.MB.com> wrote in message
> news:uedn1jGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>Hello Bart,
>>Can you pl. check the AWE option?
>>http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
>>Cheers,
>>MB
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
>>Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
>>is a DESKTOP version.
>>The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
>>FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
>>those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
>>By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
>>plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>>difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>>SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>>
>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>Bart
>>You are right, my mistake, sorry
>>For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>>330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>>SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>Bart
>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>>>
>>>The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>>>that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>>>information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>>>that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>>>objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or
>>>maybe how to swap them.
>>>
>>>thanks
>>>Bart
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>|||Works like a charm. Thanks John John
"John John" <audetweld@.nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:OdafzcHQHHA.1380@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Try here: http://www.extremeexperts.com/SQL/FAQ/EnablingPerCounters.aspx
> John
> Bart Steur wrote:
>> I've looked into this, but I don't think this option applies to my
>> situation. First we are using Window 2003 Server Standard, and second
>> this is for very large memory sizes. We only have 4 GB. But thanks for
>> the support. Any other suggestions are welcome.
>> Regards
>> Bart
>> "MB" <MB@.MB.com> wrote in message
>> news:uedn1jGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>Hello Bart,
>>Can you pl. check the AWE option?
>>http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
>>Cheers,
>>MB
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
>>Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program
>>(BACKUPEXEC) is a DESKTOP version.
>>The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
>>FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
>>those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
>>By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because
>>we plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>>difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>>SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>>
>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>Bart
>>You are right, my mistake, sorry
>>For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>>330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First
>>99
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>>SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>Bart
>>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>>>
>>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>>news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>>>
>>>The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>>>that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>>>information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>>>that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>>>objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or
>>>maybe how to swap them.
>>>
>>>thanks
>>>Bart
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>|||You're welcome.
John
Bart Steur wrote:
> Works like a charm. Thanks John John
> "John John" <audetweld@.nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
> news:OdafzcHQHHA.1380@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>Try here: http://www.extremeexperts.com/SQL/FAQ/EnablingPerCounters.aspx
>>John
>>Bart Steur wrote:
>>
>>I've looked into this, but I don't think this option applies to my
>>situation. First we are using Window 2003 Server Standard, and second
>>this is for very large memory sizes. We only have 4 GB. But thanks for
>>the support. Any other suggestions are welcome.
>>Regards
>>Bart
>>"MB" <MB@.MB.com> wrote in message
>>news:uedn1jGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>
>>Hello Bart,
>>Can you pl. check the AWE option?
>>http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
>>Cheers,
>>MB
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>
>>Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
>>Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program
>>(BACKUPEXEC) is a DESKTOP version.
>>The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
>>FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
>>those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
>>By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because
>>we plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>>difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>>SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>>
>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>
>>Bart
>>You are right, my mistake, sorry
>>For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>>330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First
>>99
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>>SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>
>>>Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>>news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>
>>>Bart
>>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>>>
>>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>>news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>
>>>Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>>>
>>>The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>>>that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>>>information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>>>that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>>>objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or
>>>maybe how to swap them.
>>>
>>>thanks
>>>Bart
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
We are running W2003 Server with SQL Server 2000. Now I want to monitor
performance using the administrative tool Performance.
According to the SQL Server 2000 System Administration (Chapter 14), there
should be several SQL Server Performance Objects to track SQL server
activity, but...
I can't find them. What happend, where are they.
Anyone?
Thanks,
BartBart
I'm nbot sure uinderstand you. Click Start --Run --perfmon.
On the sceen right click and Add counters. There is Perfomance Object
combobox where you can choose many counters for SQL Server as well
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:%23EaGga8PHHA.404@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Hello
> We are running W2003 Server with SQL Server 2000. Now I want to monitor
> performance using the administrative tool Performance.
> According to the SQL Server 2000 System Administration (Chapter 14), there
> should be several SQL Server Performance Objects to track SQL server
> activity, but...
> I can't find them. What happend, where are they.
> Anyone?
> Thanks,
> Bart
>|||Thats the problem, It should be there but it isn't.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:OGHpRg8PHHA.3544@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> I'm nbot sure uinderstand you. Click Start --Run --perfmon.
> On the sceen right click and Add counters. There is Perfomance Object
> combobox where you can choose many counters for SQL Server as well
>
>
>
>
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:%23EaGga8PHHA.404@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Hello
>> We are running W2003 Server with SQL Server 2000. Now I want to monitor
>> performance using the administrative tool Performance.
>> According to the SQL Server 2000 System Administration (Chapter 14),
>> there should be several SQL Server Performance Objects to track SQL
>> server activity, but...
>> I can't find them. What happend, where are they.
>> Anyone?
>> Thanks,
>> Bart
>|||Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that came
with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information. The last
one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the one I would
like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the other SQL server
into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap them.
thanks
Bart|||Bart
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that
> came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information. The
> last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the one I
> would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the other SQL
> server into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap them.
> thanks
> Bart
>|||Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that
>> came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information.
>> The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the one
>> I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the other SQL
>> server into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>|||Bart
You are right, my mistake, sorry
For detailed information, please reference the following article:
330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that
>> came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information.
>> The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the
>> one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the
>> other SQL server into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap
>> them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>|||Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC) is
a DESKTOP version.
The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So those
may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any difference
in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the SQLS2000 System
Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Bart
> You are right, my mistake, sorry
> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>
> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another that
>> came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup information.
>> The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But that's not the
>> one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the objects of the
>> other SQL server into the performance monitor, or maybe how to swap
>> them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>>
>|||Bart
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
I have my doubt that a 'bad' written query will perform better if you add
more memory. I'd run SQL Server Profiler to identify long running queries
and start tunning them
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
> is a DESKTOP version.
> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> You are right, my mistake, sorry
>> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>> that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>> information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>> that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>> objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or maybe
>> how to swap them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>>
>>
>|||Hello Bart,
Can you pl. check the AWE option?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
Cheers,
MB
"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
> is a DESKTOP version.
> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>
> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> You are right, my mistake, sorry
>> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>> that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>> information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>> that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>> objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or maybe
>> how to swap them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>>
>>
>|||That would be the next step, but I got stuck at perfmon, because I couldn't
find any counters.
I'll skip to that part now, and hope to find info on the counters in the
mean time. If you have any more info, please let me know.
regards,
Bart
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:%23jD6leGQHHA.780@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Bart
>> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
>> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
> I have my doubt that a 'bad' written query will perform better if you add
> more memory. I'd run SQL Server Profiler to identify long running queries
> and start tunning them
>
>
>
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
>> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
>> is a DESKTOP version.
>> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
>> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
>> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
>> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
>> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> You are right, my mistake, sorry
>> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>> that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>> information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>> that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>> objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or
>> maybe how to swap them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>>
>>
>>
>|||I've looked into this, but I don't think this option applies to my
situation. First we are using Window 2003 Server Standard, and second this
is for very large memory sizes. We only have 4 GB. But thanks for the
support. Any other suggestions are welcome.
Regards
Bart
"MB" <MB@.MB.com> wrote in message
news:uedn1jGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hello Bart,
> Can you pl. check the AWE option?
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
> Cheers,
> MB
> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
>> Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
>> is a DESKTOP version.
>> The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
>> FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
>> those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
>> By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
>> plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>> difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>> SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> You are right, my mistake, sorry
>> For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>> 330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>> SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>> "Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>> news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Bart
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>> "Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>> The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>> that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>> information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>> that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>> objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or
>> maybe how to swap them.
>> thanks
>> Bart
>>
>>
>>
>>
>|||Try here: http://www.extremeexperts.com/SQL/FAQ/EnablingPerCounters.aspx
John
Bart Steur wrote:
> I've looked into this, but I don't think this option applies to my
> situation. First we are using Window 2003 Server Standard, and second this
> is for very large memory sizes. We only have 4 GB. But thanks for the
> support. Any other suggestions are welcome.
> Regards
> Bart
> "MB" <MB@.MB.com> wrote in message
> news:uedn1jGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>Hello Bart,
>>Can you pl. check the AWE option?
>>http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
>>Cheers,
>>MB
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
>>Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program (BACKUPEXEC)
>>is a DESKTOP version.
>>The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
>>FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
>>those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
>>By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because we
>>plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>>difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>>SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>>
>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>Bart
>>You are right, my mistake, sorry
>>For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>>330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First 99
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>>SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>Bart
>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>>>
>>>The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>>>that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>>>information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>>>that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>>>objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or
>>>maybe how to swap them.
>>>
>>>thanks
>>>Bart
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>|||Works like a charm. Thanks John John
"John John" <audetweld@.nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:OdafzcHQHHA.1380@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Try here: http://www.extremeexperts.com/SQL/FAQ/EnablingPerCounters.aspx
> John
> Bart Steur wrote:
>> I've looked into this, but I don't think this option applies to my
>> situation. First we are using Window 2003 Server Standard, and second
>> this is for very large memory sizes. We only have 4 GB. But thanks for
>> the support. Any other suggestions are welcome.
>> Regards
>> Bart
>> "MB" <MB@.MB.com> wrote in message
>> news:uedn1jGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>Hello Bart,
>>Can you pl. check the AWE option?
>>http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
>>Cheers,
>>MB
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
>>Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program
>>(BACKUPEXEC) is a DESKTOP version.
>>The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
>>FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
>>those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
>>By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because
>>we plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>>difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>>SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>>
>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>Bart
>>You are right, my mistake, sorry
>>For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>>330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First
>>99
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>>SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>
>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>Bart
>>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>>>
>>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>>news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>>>
>>>The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>>>that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>>>information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>>>that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>>>objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or
>>>maybe how to swap them.
>>>
>>>thanks
>>>Bart
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>|||You're welcome.
John
Bart Steur wrote:
> Works like a charm. Thanks John John
> "John John" <audetweld@.nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
> news:OdafzcHQHHA.1380@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>Try here: http://www.extremeexperts.com/SQL/FAQ/EnablingPerCounters.aspx
>>John
>>Bart Steur wrote:
>>
>>I've looked into this, but I don't think this option applies to my
>>situation. First we are using Window 2003 Server Standard, and second
>>this is for very large memory sizes. We only have 4 GB. But thanks for
>>the support. Any other suggestions are welcome.
>>Regards
>>Bart
>>"MB" <MB@.MB.com> wrote in message
>>news:uedn1jGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>
>>Hello Bart,
>>Can you pl. check the AWE option?
>>http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa213764(SQL.80).aspx
>>Cheers,
>>MB
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:uWovibGQHHA.3624@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>
>>Thanks Uri, but none of the provided solutions helped.
>>Maby it is because the SQL Server used by our Backup Program
>>(BACKUPEXEC) is a DESKTOP version.
>>The 'real' SQL Server used for our data is an ENTERPRISE edition.
>>FYI. I'm not interested in the performance of the DESKTOP version. So
>>those may be eliminated from the Perfmon.
>>By the way, the reason I'm so eager to see the performance, is because
>>we plugged in an additional 2GB (making it 4GB) and I can't see any
>>difference in (heavy) query speeds. So I lookup the tuning part in the
>>SQLS2000 System Administration book and that talked about the perfmon.
>>
>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>news:udOdfOGQHHA.4172@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>
>>Bart
>>You are right, my mistake, sorry
>>For detailed information, please reference the following article:
>>330088 BUG: SQLServer:Databases Performance Counters Limited to First
>>99
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=330088
>>
>>SQL Server 2000 Performance Counters Do Not Appear in the Performance
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=827260
>>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=812915
>>
>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>news:u5fIPIGQHHA.2468@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>
>>>Those articles do not apply to SQLServer 2000.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
>>>news:eXynY$8PHHA.5012@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>
>>>Bart
>>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227662
>>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246328
>>>
>>>"Bart Steur" <solnews@.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>>news:uJzNb68PHHA.2312@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>
>>>Some Extra information (Had a chat with our System Administrator).
>>>
>>>The W2003 Server runs 2 SQL servers. 1 SQL Server 2000 and another
>>>that came with our backup program (BACKUPEXEC) to store backup
>>>information. The last one I can see in the Performance Monitor. But
>>>that's not the one I would like to monitor. Any idea how to get the
>>>objects of the other SQL server into the performance monitor, or
>>>maybe how to swap them.
>>>
>>>thanks
>>>Bart
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)